• (303) 876-0575

Law Offices of Elizabeth “Booka” Smith, LLC Blog


October 19, 2015: Texas Court Denies Fluor's Motion to Dismiss FCA Whistleblower Retaliation Lawsuit

On October 19, 2015, the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Texas denied government defense contractor Fluor
Intercontinental Inc.’s motion to dismiss a Section H False Claims Act (FCA) whistleblower
retaliation lawsuit filed by three former Fluor employees. The three
plaintiffs, who worked for Fluor in Afghanistan, allege that they were
wrongfully terminated after internally reporting a fraudulent scheme designed
to conceal and cover up lost or stolen government property in
order to avoid liability under a property services contract with the U.S. Army.
In the written court decision denying dismissal of the lawsuit, Judge Kenneth
Hoyt cited a 2011 Fifth Circuit decision (U.S.
ex. rel. Patton v. Shaw Servs., L.L.C.) for the proposition that an FCA
Section H retaliation plaintiff must show that: (1) he or she engaged in
“protected activity” under the FCA; (2) the employer knew the employee engaged
in protected activity; and (3) the employer took adverse action because of it. Judge
Hoyt concluded that the former Fluor employees sufficiently pleaded all three
elements in their legal complaint against Fluor. Specifically, Judge Hoyt ruled
that: (1) by internally reporting their concerns that Fluor was lying to the
government in order to escape liability on a government contract the plaintiffs
did engage in protected activity; (2) by threatening Fluor that they would
report any losses “as required by the Government,” the plaintiffs put Fluor on
notice that they were engaging in protected activity; and (3) the plaintiff’s
allegations that Fluor threatened to sue them for slander, subjected to them to
a hostile work environment, denied them the proper resources to do their jobs, denied
them promotions and instead demoted them, and ultimately terminated them, met
the final causation element of the three part Section H test. If these former
employees prevail in their Section H case, they will be entitled to
reinstatement to their jobs. They will also recover double back pay with
interest plus special damages including recovery of litigation costs and attorneys’
fees. The Law Offices of Elizabeth “Booka” Smith, LLC represents plaintiffs in
Section H FCA lawsuits. If you believe your employer may be violating the FCA
and are wondering how best to report your concerns and also secure your legal
rights, or if you have already reported your concerns and as a result are
experiencing retaliation in the workplace, CONTACT US to schedule an initial
consultation to evaluate potential representation.


November 16, 2015: SEC Annual Report Reveals $37M ...
October 14, 2015: ACC Census data suggests that Fe...

By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to https://www.bookalaw.com/

1624 Market Street, Suite 202
Denver, CO, 80202

Tel (303) 876-0575
56 Road L, P.O. Box 601
Silverthorne, CO, 80498

Tel (303) 876-0575

Additional offices for meetings available in:
Boulder; Broomfield/Interlocken; Cherry Creek; Aurora; Downtown Denver; Denver Tech Center; Golden/ Lakewood; Littleton; Louisville and Park Meadows/Highlands Ranch

Disclaimer: Nothing in this website is intended in any way to form an attorney-client relationship or other contract. It is designed solely to provide general information about the practice at the Law Offices of Elizabeth “Booka” Smith. Be mindful of any deadlines you have approaching that relate to your legal situation, and make sure you meet them. The Law Offices of Elizabeth “Booka” Smith does not assume any responsibility for advice given regarding any aspect of your case until you have a signed legal services agreement engaging the firm’s representation. Though the Law Offices of Elizabeth “Booka” Smith may provide a free initial consultation, the firm retains complete discretion in every case to decide whether or not to take your case. The Law Offices of Elizabeth “Booka” Smith makes no guarantees, warranties, or predictions about your case, and past success of Booka Smith or the firm does not ensure the results will be the same.